Who Is Controlling Your Bluetooth Phone?

Who Is Controlling Your Bluetooth Phone?

Researchers describe new way to attack you, even if phone security
features are on.

Matthew Broersma, Techworld.com
Monday, June 06, 2005

Two security researchers say they have discovered a technique for
taking control of Bluetooth-enabled mobile phones, even when the
handsets have security features switched on.

The technique is a practical implementation of a technique described
by Ollie Whitehouse of security firm @Stake last year, which allows an
attacker with specialized equipment to connect to a Bluetooth handset
without authorization. Once the connection is established, the
attacker could make calls on the target's handset, siphon off data or
listen in on data transfers between the device and, for example, a PC.
Some security firms recommend financial traders avoid Bluetooth
handsets because of the potential attack.

The original method required an attacker to listen in on the initial
connection procedure between two Bluetooth devices -- called "pairing"
-- which occurs only rarely. The new attack however allows an attacker
to force two devices to repeat the pairing procedure, allowing the
attacker to listen in and determine the identification code (PIN) used
to protect the connection.

The researchers, senior lecturer Avishai Wool and graduate student
Yaniv Shaked of Tel Aviv University's School of Electrical Engineering
Systems, were to present their paper, "Cracking the Bluetooth PIN," at
this week's MobiSys conference in Seattle.

Already Leaky

Various security holes have already appeared in Bluetooth, which is
becoming widely used in mobile phones and high-end "smart phones."
However, most require a poor implementation of Bluetooth's security
features, or for the device to be left in "discoverable" mode.
Whitehouse's attack, by contrast, could be used against a handset with
security features switched on.

Whitehouse's attack is difficult to implement, because it requires the
attacker to pick up some information during the pairing process. From
this data, an attacker could determine the PIN for the connection,
with the length of time depending on the number of digits in the PIN
-- under a second for four-digit PINs, which are standard on most
devices.

Wool and Shaked's attack goes a step further, describing three methods
for forcing a repeat of the pairing process. Using the information
from this exchange, the researchers were able to determine the PIN in
0.06 to 0.3 seconds for a 4-digit PIN, according to the paper.

For example, a user could be asked to re-enter the PIN number for
connecting to his or her wireless headset, according to the paper.
Once the two devices re-connected, the attacker would easily be able
to crack the PIN in most cases. Many users could be fooled by this,
since such re-pairing is built into the Bluetooth specification; in
fact many devices have a mode requiring the user to re-enter their PIN
each time a connection is made, the researchers said.

"Taken together, this is an impressive result," said security expert
Bruce Schneier in a Weblog post.

Wool and Shaked recommend users refrain from entering their pairing
PINs as much as possible, particularly in public places. Using longer
PINs can also make a big difference, they said--even a six-digit PIN
would take 10 seconds to crack, while a 10-digit number would require
weeks, according to Whitehouse. Users may find they don't have a
choice, since many devices only allow four-digit PINs.

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/...060705X,00.asp


===
"In the future, my private life will be expressed solely through art."
-- Britney Spears