" Physics is first of all the vacuum".

[socratus]

About Reference Systems: Vacuum and Space.
From times of Newton in classical physics the principle worked:

" Until the reference system is specified, any conversations on movement

are completely deprived the contents."

Newton, first of all physicists realized, what a main role a reference system has.

The choice of reference system is a central, basic question at the commencement of any task

But the founders of the “Big Bang” theory have forgotten this.

Nowhere do they write in what reference system the "Big Bang" took place,

and in what reference system the substance of the "single point " is distributed.

And consequently, the theory of the "Big Bang" is constructed on a sand.

* * *

The astronomers have established the fact of galaxy rotation

but nobody speaks of the reference system in which they rotate.

Without the inclusion of a reference system the rotation of galaxies

is deprived of any content. To avoid this problem, write:

Each Galaxy is surrounded by an "accompanying reference system",

and the "accompanying reference system" is extended.

/ The Physics of Space. is a small Soviet encyclopedia published in 1986./

This is a joke!

For example, I am at home and I am surrounded by an "accompanying reference system";

my house. Then I go to work surrounded by an "accompanying reference system";

And when I have arrived on the job, I am surrounded by an

"accompanying reference system", the university.

But if we do not understand that we work in the reference system of the Earth,

and the astronomers do not understand in what reference system

the billions of galaxies rotate, any statement is meaningless.

Only when the reference system is specified, then the words "galaxies rotate"

and "Big Bang" make sense.

The first problem in the discussion of the laws of motion is to answer the question,

"In what reference system does this motion occur?

In what reference system are the laws of motion formulated?"

This question is most unpleasant for the amateurs in abstract reasoning and conjecture.

God teaches man to think particularly and logically.

The Devil teaches man to speak with beautiful, general and abstract phrases.

By such method he easily hides the truth from the people.

* * *

The main paradox in physics is not understanding reference systems.

Einstein and Infeld wrote:

“We have the laws, but are not aware what the body of reference system they belong to,

and all our physical construction appears erected on sand”.

They are right. The essence is that now there is no precise border

which divides two different frame of reference:

1) System of Vacuum and
2) Gravitational frame of reference.

Now these two systems are considered as though they were common.

But they are completely different systems.

There, where there is a vacuum - there is no gravitation.

In the vacuum, one set of laws - the laws of the vacuum work

( not taking into account external influences).

Where there is gravitation, there is no vacuum.

In a gravitational reference system

a complete set of other laws apply.

These laws are connected and take into account external influences.

How these two systems cooperate between themselves is explained on the following site.

[socratus]

Two views of the Vacuum

In modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view

on the behaviour of particles in a Vacuum. One point of view is

the position of classical physics which says that:

In the vacuum at T=0K any movement of a particle stops.
And if in the Empire of Cold there is no movement, it is a dead empire.

But another point of view completely rejects this formulation.

This point of view is expressed in the quantum theory. In 1911, M. Planck

stated that energy does not become zero at the approach T=0K.

He declared this on the 1st Solvay congress. So " Energy at T=0K" became

the main problem in physics because " Physics is first of all the vacuum".

Gradually it began to appear that Vacuum at T=0K is not empty dead space.

There live the "virtual" particles. These particles originally have negative and

imaginary mass, and then make a virtual transition » to positive mass,

becoming real particles. But the apparently mystical "virtual particles"

as they make "virtual transitions". explains little.

Let's rethink these "virtual" particles. Let's ask a question:

What is the geometrical form of "virtual" particles in the Vacuum at T=0K?

The answer is:

According to the laws of physics :

J. Charles ( 1787), Gay-Lussac ( 1802), V. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925)

particles in a Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should be flat figures.

This means, particles have the geometrical form of a circle, as from all flat figures

the circle has the most optimum form: C/D=pi.

What are these "virtual" circles in the vacuum?

The answer is given in the theory of radiation of absolute black bodies.

The theory considers an area of the space which are in absolute thermal balance.

It is possible only at T=0K. But it is known, that such a condition is a

"thermal death " and is not observed in nature. Therefore Planck, studying this area,

came to the conclusion that condition T=0K has changed. In this space there should be

a radiation of a quantum of light, possessing an internal impulse h=Et=1.

So, « the virtual circle » is transformed to quantum of light.

This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and travels with constant speed, c=1.

From this assumption Quantum theory was born.

Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about a quantum of light and its various transformations.

And classical theory considers all other particles.

These particles have mass much greater than a quantum of light and

move with much smaller speeds. If we understand the difference between

a quantum of light and all other particles,

then all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all of physics becomes a

harmoniously integral science.



The Vacuum and the Electron

All know, that an electron is not a firm sphere. All know, that its form can be changed.

But nobody understands the borders of the change of the geometrical form of the electron.

So, what are the borders of this change? Quantum theory gives an answer to this question.

It says that at the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, the energy and mass of the

electron become infinite. Physics does not understand what to do with infinite sizes

and therefore have thought up "a method of renormalization", a method

"to sweep the dust under the carpet" / Feynman./

But the situation can be understood another way. Electrons, having the geometrical form

of a sphere, lose their volume and turn into an indefinitely flat circle. In this is the reason

for the occurrence of infinite sizes for the electron. But in physics we know

only one particle which has the form of a flat circle. It is a quantum of light

which flies rectilinearly with speed c= 1.

Hence, the electron turns into a quantum of light. Hence, the electron and a quantum of light

is the same particle in different states.

In the books it is written, that electrons interact among themselves with the help of

a quantum of light. In the books it is written that an electron in an atom passing from

one orbit to another radiates a quantum of light. It should be understood as follows.

The electron has a quantum of light in a pocket or under a "shirt" which from time to time

is freed. Interesting. But why is it necessary for it to hide?

* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site

http://www.socratus.com
Socratus.

[socratus]

The leaves and roots.

The tree is covered with a lot of leaves.
The leaves rustle, speak, argue among themselves.

But shouldn't they know that the roots feed them?

Physicists behave as leaves.

They rustle, speak, argue among themselves.

But they forget the roots of science, namely that we build the base

of a science on abstract ideas.

The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract

Separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.

The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract

ideal gas theory.

The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on

the abstract black body theory.

The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory

of four-dimensional space theory.

On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of

science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.

But in nature there are no paradoxes observed.

Something is not in order with logical thinking.

It is necessary to stop, look back and

to reconsider the abstract base of science.

But everyone is in a hurry to try to understand reality,

and they create new abstraction. It is a way to “mad infinity”.

Therefore we live in the world of abstraction, of paradoxes,

in the Orwell,s world.

How to break off this circuit of abstraction?